 Edward Drinker Cope was not exactly known for his sunny disposition. One of the key players in the “Bone Wars” of the late 19th century, his long-running feud with fellow bone sharp Othniel Charles Marsh is the stuff of scientific legend. The two former friends tussled over everything from fossil sites to the naming rights of extinct creatures, with their embarrassing spat spilling into public view via The New York Herald in 1890.
Edward Drinker Cope was not exactly known for his sunny disposition. One of the key players in the “Bone Wars” of the late 19th century, his long-running feud with fellow bone sharp Othniel Charles Marsh is the stuff of scientific legend. The two former friends tussled over everything from fossil sites to the naming rights of extinct creatures, with their embarrassing spat spilling into public view via The New York Herald in 1890.
Marsh was not the only source of regular discomfort and irritation Cope faced. In the early 1990s, photographer Louis Psihoyos and writer John Knoebber borrowed the naturalist’s bones for an extended — and unauthorized — road trip to meet some of Cope’s intellectual descendants. Along the way, they met with paleontologist Paul Sereno, who recognized that Cope had tooth abscess that undoubtedly made the cantankerous fossil hunter extra grumpy near the time of his death in 1897.
A specimen of one of the many prehistoric creatures Cope named during his career also suffered from a painful dental pathology. Found in the approximately 275 million-year-old rock of the midwestern United States, Labidosaurus belonged to an early radiation of lizard-like reptiles known as captorhinids, and Cope initially described it in 1896. Numerous specimens have been found since that time, but one — CMNH 76876 — shows the earliest evidence of bacterial infection yet discovered in a land-dwelling vertebrate.
The peculiar dental anatomy of Labidosaurus was at least partly to blame for its ailment. According to paleontologists Robert Reisz, Diane Scott, Bruce Pynn and Sean Modesto, a difference in tooth replacement may have made the reptile more susceptible to injury and disease. In other reptiles of the time, the teeth were only loosely fixed in the jaw and were constantly in the process of being replaced by newer teeth that erupted in the same sockets. Labidosaurus and other captorhinids, by contrast, not only had teeth that were more strongly fixed to the jaw, but new teeth erupted at a slower rate in different positions. If one of their teeth was broken, in other words, the area would be more susceptible to infection owing to the long and unusual pattern of replacement.

A line drawing of the skull of Labidosaurus (top), and a close-up of the lower jaw designated CMNH 76876 showing two missing teeth (tp1, tp3) and an abscess. From Reisz et al., 2011.
In the Labidosaurus specimen examined by Reisz and colleagues, the first and third teeth in the jaw were broken. The sockets had been filled in with bone. This was strange. In other reptiles, the broken teeth would have been lost and new ones would have taken their place, but in this Labidosaurus a pathology had developed instead. Three empty tooth sockets and a nearby abscess also showed signs of a deep infection, and the degree to which the pathology developed indicated that the animal had been living with the damage for some time.
We will never know exactly what happened, but the scientists behind the new study were able to reconstruct the sequence of events. The unfortunate Labidosaurus had lost the two teeth at the front of the jaw first, and oral bacteria had become trapped inside the jaw when the damaged tooth roots were covered by bone. Things only got worse from there. The bacteria triggered a severe bone infection, leading to the loss of three teeth and irreversible damage in the inflamed, pus-oozing portion of the jaw. If this chronic infection did not contribute to the death of the Labidosaurus, it was still active when the animal died.
Cope was not a particularly close relative of Labidosaurus — the ancestors and collateral relatives of mammals had already split from their common ancestor with reptiles long before 275 million years ago — but the injuries in the influential naturalist and the lizard-like reptile can be traced back to a similar condition. Though the anatomy of our own jaws is different than that of Labidosaurus, we only get two sets of teeth during our lifetime, and this gives injury and disease the opportunity to run rampant if we do not seek treatment. Cope could have blamed this bit of evolutionary inheritance from earlier mammals for his chronic tooth trouble, though his enmity towards Marsh alone left him feeling plenty sore.
Top image: A restoration of Labidosaurus by ?. ???. Image from Wikimedia Commons.
References: Reisz, R., Scott, D., Pynn, B., & Modesto, S. (2011). Osteomyelitis in a Paleozoic reptile: ancient evidence for bacterial infection and its evolutionary significance Naturwissenschaften DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0792-1
Authors:
 Le principe Noemi concept
		    			Le principe Noemi concept			   
			 Astuces informatiques
		    			Astuces informatiques			   
			 Webbuzz & Tech info
		    			Webbuzz & Tech info			   
			 Noemi météo
		    			Noemi météo			   
			 Notions de Météo
		    			Notions de Météo			   
			 Animation satellite
		    			Animation satellite			   
			 Mesure du taux radiation
		    			Mesure du taux radiation			   
			 NC Communication & Design
		    			NC Communication & Design			   
			 News Département Com
		    			News Département Com			   
			 Portfolio
		    			Portfolio			   
			 NC Print et Event
		    			NC Print et Event			   
			 NC Video
		    			NC Video			   
			 Le département Edition
		    			Le département Edition			   
			 Les coups de coeur de Noemi
		    			Les coups de coeur de Noemi			   
			 News Grande Région
		    			News Grande Région			   
			 News Finance France
		    			News Finance France			   
			 Glance.lu
		    			Glance.lu			   
			







