Elections have a dirty secret: Counting lots of ballots with absolute precision is impossible. Those infamous hanging chads from a decade ago are just one of the many glitches that can—and do—arise. Several states require a super- careful hand count in select precincts to double-check close results, and they nearly always find miscounted ballots. A few such slipups don’t matter, but multiple mistakes will alter the election results. Most laws leave the determination of the recount threshold to the discretion of registrars.
<![CDATA[
#votes_cont {
width:630px;
float:left;
clear:both;
padding-left:40px;
}
.votes_bit {
float:left;
width:135px;
margin-right:13px;
}
.votes_bit.last {
margin-right:0px;
}
.votes_big {
font-size:2em;
}
#content #votes_cont p {
font-size:1.1em;
line-height:1.1em;
}
]]>P The probability that you’d see the current error rate if the winner didn’t really win. If P is higher than about 10 percent, the result might well be incorrect, so keep double-counting more precincts.
n
?
i=1
?
i=1
The product of multiplying results for all the audited precincts (n). For each precinct, calculate the maximum possible error (U) and
. Then multiply all those ratios together.
ti The error rate you actually find in a precinct, as a proportion of the maximum possible error.
U The maximum possible error if every vote for the “winner” is miscounted and is really a vote for the “loser.”
Photo: Daniel Salo
Authors: Wired








